Prestipino.github.io

my page to dump few stuff

View the Project on GitHub

Profile function with physical meaning the number 7 in Fullprof

Thompson, Cox and Hastings

Instrumental contribution

The instrumental contribution in accordance with the paper of Caglioti Pauletti and Ricci is gaussian (they worked with neutron ;-)) and it is controlle by the famous formula \[\Gamma^2 = U tan^2(\theta) + V tan(\theta) + W\] The three terms account for basic broadening by slits(collimator), wavelenght dispersion, monochromator mosaicity influence of monochromator as described by Cagliotti
for instance for energy dispersion (resolution) \(\partial \lambda \over \lambda \) by derivation of the Bragg formula \(2d sin(\theta) = n\lambda\) \[ \partial \theta = n \frac{\partial(\lambda)}{2 d cos(\theta)} \] \[ \partial \theta = tan(\theta) \frac{\partial \lambda}{\lambda}\]

shape of the resolution function for instrumentals parameters

Sample contributions

shape of the resolution function for sample parameters XY are considered for FullProf for Gsas it is the opposite

Strain contribution

If Strain is defined as \(\partial d \over d\) it is very easy to derive the enlargment of the peaks as function of \(\theta \) by derivation of the Bragg formula \[d_{hkl} = \frac{n\lambda}{2sin(\theta)}\] \[ \partial d = - \frac{\lambda}{2 tan(\theta)sin(\theta)} \partial\theta \] \[\epsilon_{hkl} = \frac{\partial d_{hkl}}{d_{hkl}} = -\frac{1}{tan(\theta)} \partial \theta\] \[\partial theta = -\epsilon_{hkl} tan(\theta) \]

Size contribution

This size broadening is described by the Scherrer equation. We now reproduce the simple derivation following Klug and Alexander (1974) or Bilinge & Dinebier (2008). The derivation is build considering that for a crystal for small deviation from Bragg angle \(\theta + \epsilon \) there will be a plane for which the difference of path lenght \(\Delta \) will be \(\lambda \over 2\) producing destructive interference. If the crystal is too small such plane will never arrive and intensity will be present.

path length difference of the scattered ray versus the depth of the lattice plane in the crystal

The additional beam path between consecutive lattice planes at is: \[\Delta = 2 d sin(\theta + \epsilon) = 2 d (sin(\theta) cos(\epsilon) + cos(\theta) sin(\epsilon) \] \[\Delta \approx n \lambda + 2 d cos(\theta) \epsilon \] The corresponding phase difference is then: \[\delta \varphi = 2 \pi \frac{\Delta}{\lambda} = 4 \frac{4 \pi \epsilon d cos(\theta)}{\lambda} \] The phase difference between the top and the bottom layer, p is then: \[\delta \varphi = 4 p \frac{4 \pi \epsilon d cos(\theta)}{\lambda} = 4 \frac{4 \pi \epsilon L_{hkl} cos(\theta)}{\lambda}\] \[\epsilon = \frac{\lambda \delta \varphi}{4 \pi L_{hkl} cos(\theta)} \] where \(L_{hkl}\) is the crystallite size. Using a \(2\theta\) scale and the concept of integral breath: \[\beta_{hkl}=4 \epsilon = \frac{\lambda}{L_{hkl} cos(\theta)} \] generalizing for a spherical particle we obtain the Scherrer equation (K is function of grain shape, 0.89 for spheres) : \[\beta=\frac{K \lambda}{L cos(\theta)} \]

Hosted on GitHub Pages — Theme by orderedlist